NEWS RELEASE

February 8, 2002                                                                                                   For Immediate Release

ALLIANCE GOVERNMENT WILL CANCEL GUN REGISTRY PRIVATIZATION CONTRACT

“When Bill C-68 is repealed, a private company will not be needed to run an effective gun control program.”

 

Yorkton – Today, Garry Breitkreuz, the Official Opposition’s gun control critic, served notice on all companies bidding on a proposed 15-year contract with the federal government to help implement and operate the Justice Department’s problem-plagued gun registry.  News reports put the estimated value of the contract at $300 million.  “I asked the lawyers in the Library of Parliament to tell me how we could cancel this contract without experiencing the problems the Liberals did when they cancelled the Pearson Airport deal,” said Breitkreuz.  “The government has broken every promise they made about the gun registry and wasted almost $700 million in taxpayers’ dollars on their politically-motivated firearms fiasco.  We intend to put a stop to this useless program and the red ink as soon as the Liberals are kicked out of office.  I thought it was only fair to warn the companies bidding on this unnecessary contract.”

 

The Library of Parliament wrote: Section H of the Canadian Firearms Centre Request for Proposals (CFCRFP) – Model Contract – includes a reference in clause 40 a “Termination of Convenience” clause that enables the Minister to terminate the contract at any time prior to completion of the work.  In the event of such a termination, the government would pay for costs incurred up to the termination event.  Clause 40 incorporates by reference the standard Public Works and Government Services Canada Termination for Convenience clause set out as clause 27 of DSS-MAS 9601 (16/02/98) General Conditions - Long Form.  The Library attached copies of the 3-page “Termination of Convenience” clause to their research paper.  “If any of the companies that have submitted proposals would like copies of the Library of Parliament research paper, they should contact my office,” offered Breitkreuz.

 

“In 1995, our party promised in Parliament to repeal Bill C-68 because it is a bad law.  Six years of bureaucratic blunders and cost overruns have proven us right.  We have fought two election campaigns promising to repeal the current firearms law (C-68) and replace it with a practical firearms control system that is cost effective and respects the rights of Canadians to own and use firearms responsibly.”

 

Replacing Bill C-68 will be based on the following principles:

·         It will crackdown hard on criminals who use weapons - not responsible firearm owners;

·         It will be easy to understand, administer and enforce;

·         It will be cost-effective at reducing the criminal use of firearms;

·         It will curtail smuggling and black-market gun sales;

·         It will convince the vast majority of gun owners to help the government and police implement it;

·         It will convince all taxpayers to share the cost - everyone benefits from improved public safety;

·         It will be able to pass a public safety test administered by the Auditor General of Canada;

·         It will respect the exclusive constitutional jurisdiction of the provinces; and

·         It will respect the fundamental rights of all individuals – especially property rights.

 

-30-