FIREARMS
FACTS - UPDATE
WHY ALL INFORMATION IN THE GUN REGISTRY
MUST BE “VERIFIED” AS ACCURATE!
May
14, 2003
SOLICITOR GENERAL WAYNE EASTER:
Hansard - May 14, 2003:
"Not all of the firearms entered in the
Canadian firearms registry require verification."
To put Solicitor General Wayne Easter's statement about verification of firearms in perspective one needs to know the position of the Canadian Police Association on this issue and what the Canadian Firearms Centre's own "Firearm Uniqueness Study" says.
CANADIAN
POLICE ASSOCIATION: 1999 Resolutions - Page 18:
"The
credibility and accuracy of registration information is paramount in ensuring
the system meets the expectations of Canadian police officers. The Canadian Police Association recommends that the Auditor
General of Canada conduct a thorough review of the firearms registration system
to include: 1. Verification of the accuracy of information being collected in
the firearms registration database;"
CANADIAN
FIREARMS CENTRE FIREARMS UNIQUENESS STUDY:
"Finding
#1 - There is an identified investigative, legal and evidentiary need to
uniquely identify all firearms in Canada."
"Recommendations
#1 - THE REGISTRY SHOULD UNIQUELY IDENTIFY ALL FIREARMS IN CANADA."
Mandatory
Fields Required for Uniqueness
Class:
non-restricted: Type, Action, Serial #
Class:
restricted/prohibited: Type, Action, Serial #, Make, Model, Calibre, Barrel
Length
JUSTICE
DEPT. ADMITS 40-48% ERROR RATE IN OLD GUN REGISTRY
The
following quote is from a copy of a document dated October 22, 1997 sent by fax
from the Department of Justice to the RCMP titled, APPENDIX 4 - RATIONAL FOR
REGISTRATION states: "The current registry of restricted firearms
(1.2 million guns) has experienced 40 to 48% error rate.
These human errors are often misplaced digits or errors in filling out
the form."
NOTE:
This document was obtained from the RCMP by way of an Access to
Information Act request initiated on September 25, 2001 and responded to on
December 5, 2002 - RCMP File: 01ATIP-43167
APPENDIX
4 - RATIONAL FOR REGISTRATION
WHY
CONFIRM THE DATA COLLECTED?
ANSWER
1. TRUST THE DATA
-
Faith in the data contained in the system is mission critical for everyone who
will use the data.
-
Implementing a registry will mean that we have collected some information about
gun owners. Confirming this
information greatly increases the trust we place on the data.
-
Police need to have faith in the registry system.
Even the NFA agrees that unconfirmed information reduces the usefulness
of the registry. (The NFA has already suggested that people might as well
register toasters if we are not confirming the data sent by owners). Verifying will avoid phony registrations.
-
Without the means of confirming information, we loose support from police forces
(including the RCMP), provinces and coalition members.
ANSWER
2. REDUCE ERROR RATES
ANSWER
3. PROVIDE BETTER SERVICE
ANSWER
4. FIGHT CRIME
-----------------------------------
E-MAIL
From:
Murray A. Smith, Firearms Section, RCMP Forensics Laboratory Services
To:
Peter McArthur, Justice Department
Date:
23 Nov 1995 10:10
Subject:
Firearms Uniqueness Study (FUS) Forwarded-Reply
"If
firearms are not uniquely distinguishable either by a single characteristic or
combination of characteristics then firearms registration records almost
certainly will be duplicated in the registration data base.
This would prevent the registry from making a definitive statement of
whether a particular firearm is either registered or not.
There would be no way to link a specific registration certificate or data
base entry to a particular firearm. This
would hinder field checks, investigations and prosecutions.
Under the present system, firearms are distinguished by three main
characteristics: make/manufacturer, model and serial number.
Other characteristics such as barrel length and calibre are also employed
but are less useful. While each of
the three main characteristics are often duplicated their combination is usually
unique. Most of the difficulties
with identification of firearms can be traced to absence of one or more of these
characteristics. The single most
important unique identifier of a firearm is its serial number."
----------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER
OF GUNS IN CANADA =
16.5 Million
Documented
as of: December 13, 2001
Click Here for more information:
http://www.cssa-cila.org/garryb/breitkreuzgpress/GunControl50.htm
NUMBER
OF GUNS REGISTERED =
6,019,925
Documented
as of: April 15, 2003
Click Here for more information:
http://www.cssa-cila.org/garryb/publications/FirearmsRegistered-2003-04-15.xls
NUMBER
OF REGISTERED FIREARMS THAT HAVE BEEN “VERIFIED” – 1,081,589
Documented
as of: January 23, 2003
Click
Here for more information:
http://www.cssa-cila.org/garryb/breitkreuzgpress/guns73.htm
#
OF REGISTRATIONS WITH BLANK AND UNKNOWN ENTRIES –
3,235,647
Documented
as of: August 29, 2002
Click
Here for more information:
http://www.cssa-cila.org/garryb/publications/BlankandUnknownEntries-Aug292002.pdf
NUMBER
OF GUNS REGISTERED WITHOUT SERIAL NUMBERS = 728,046
Documents
Updated: August 29, 2002
Click
Here for more information:
http://www.cssa-cila.org/garryb/publications/BlankandUnknownEntries-Aug292002.pdf
http://www.cssa-cila.org/garryb/publications/serialnumbers.htm
#
OF “STICKERS” ISSUED FOR GUNS WITHOUT SERIAL NUMBERS = 813,822
Documents
Updated: November 1, 2002
Click
Here for more information:
http://www.cssa-cila.org/garryb/publications/CFC-11-01-2003.htm
#
FIREARMS TO BE RE-REGISTERED FROM OLD GUN REGISTRY = 727,386
Documented
as of: April 15,
2003
Click
Here for more information:
http://www.cssa-cila.org/garryb/publications/FirearmsRegistered-2003-04-15.xls