PUBLICATION:
The
Record (Waterloo Region)
DATE:
2003.08.14
SECTION:
Insight
PAGE:
A9
BYLINE:
STEVEN MARTINOVICH
PHOTO:
Photo: CANADIAN PRESS
ILLUSTRATION:
Stickers question the wisdom of Canada's gun registry as Giovanni
Interdonato inspects a shotgun in his gun shop in Toronto last winter. The
sticker says, "If guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns.";
Photo: Steven Martinovich
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gun
registry support just keeps on falling
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The
federal government has long counted on the support of Canadians when it comes to
its gun control agenda. That support has enabled it to pass increasingly
stringent legislation culminating in Bill C-68, the act that created the
out-of-control spending program known as the firearms registry.
A
poll conducted by Calgary's JMCK Polling contained some uncomfortable news for
the federal government. Only 39 per cent of Canadians still support the registry
while 49 per cent want it scrapped.
With
the exception of Quebec, support in each province for the registry was well
below 50 per cent. Alberta led the way with only 27 per cent support but even
Ontario, with a meagre 38 per cent support, registered strong disapproval.
Not
surprisingly, the federal government dismissed the poll, which was commissioned
by Canadian Alliance MP Garry Breitkreuz, as mere anti-government partisanship.
"I
don't put a lot of merit in Garry Breitkreuz's polls. He is trying to make his
point and condemn the gun registry and that's his right to do so. I'm concerned
about the slant," said Federal Solicitor General Wayne Easter.
It's
humorous to see the federal government concerned about slant, but regardless of
how the poll was constructed, Easter is wrong if he believes Breitkreuz's long
established opposition to the firearms registry is the reason for the growing
anger over the program.
A
more likely explanation for the poll's results is that Canadians are beginning
to realize what the gun registry's critics have been arguing for years, that the
program will not live up to the grand expectations that the federal government
has set out for it.
For
all the money spent on the registry, now totalling well over $1 billion -- 500
times the initial cost then justice minister Allan Rock quoted in 1995 --
Canadian Institute for Legislative Action executive director Tony Bernardo
believes only 50 per cent of Canada's firearms have been registered, while
Breitkreuz believes the number could be as low as 34 per cent.
Despite
a deadline and the possibility of a prison sentence of up to 10 years, as many
as several million firearms may yet be unregistered.
Perhaps
a good reason for all of these unregistered firearms is that employees of the
Canadian Firearms Centre are too busy enjoying life. Documents obtained by
CanWest News Service show that the CFC has spent $13 million on travel expenses
during the last six years -- $209,000 alone for former CEO Gary Webster's
travels between Edmonton and Ottawa, while another $500,000 went to
"hospitality."
None
of that compares to the $200 million, an expense 100 times the original quoted
cost of the entire gun registry, spent on a computer system that just didn't
work.
Given
the history of fiscal mismanagement by the Chrétien government none of this
should be a surprise. Rather than spend money needed on the military or health
care, the government opted for a publicity friendly initiative it believed would
show the party to be tough on crime by going after legitimate firearms owners,
and fulfil its long sought after dream of universal registration and eventual
confiscation.
The
Canadian public is beginning to see through the web of distortions and outright
lies and is voting in two ways: by not supporting the firearms registry and,
more worrisome to the federal government, by refusing to register firearms.
The
collapse in support for the firearms registry has little to do with a hidden
agenda by Breitkreuz. It does have everything to do with yet another expensive
boondoggle foisted upon Canadians by a federal government more interested in
feel-good programs, regardless of their efficacy, than responsible governance.
Steven Martinovich is a freelance writer in Sudbury.