Note:
Versions of this story also ran in the Saskatoon Star Phoenix, Edmonton
Journal and the Montreal Gazette.
PUBLICATION:
The
Ottawa Citizen
DATE:
2004.03.06
EDITION: Final
SECTION:
News
PAGE:
A6
BYLINE:
Tim Naumetz
SOURCE:
The Ottawa Citizen
ILLUSTRATION:
Colour Photo: Wayne
Cuddington, The Ottawa Citizen / 'We're doing what is right,' says Albina
Guarnieri.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gun
registry review not likely before election: Minister in charge says she will
take time she needs 'to get it right'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The
government review of the federal gun registry may not be complete prior to an
anticipated May election, says the minister reviewing the controversial program.
Despite
widespread expectations Prime Minister Paul Martin launched the review to flesh
out a new Liberal policy on the firearms program before an election, Albina
Guarnieri, the minister in charge, said yesterday that is not part of the plan.
"We're
not doing this for the election," Ms. Guarnieri, minister of state for
civil preparedness, said in an interview.
"I
have the luxury of taking the time that we really need to get it right. The task
that I was given was to find the best route forward, with what we have in place
now, and I'm doing that."
Ms.
Guarnieri's statement appears to contradict suggestions from Liberal
backbenchers, including Andy Savoy, chairman of the party's national caucus,
that the government is considering sweeping changes, including elimination of
the requirement to renew gun registration certificates. The New Brunswick
Telegraph Journal also reported the government might change the rules to require
registration of only newly acquired firearms in the future -- similar to the
licensing system that existed before the Canadian Firearms Act.
Ms.
Guarnieri, who has been meeting gun owners and sporting associations almost
non-stop since the beginning of January, said she is nonetheless only halfway
through her consultation process and has not submitted any recommendations to
cabinet.
"We're
doing what is right, the right thing for Canadians, it's not about an election
call," she emphasized.
"It's
about seeing how the program is operating, seeing what needs to be done, how it
needs to be improved. We have a prime minister who wants things done right; he
is not handcuffed by past decisions, we're not hostage to the decisions taken in
the past. He actually wants to do the right thing and I think most people would
applaud that."
Asked
if her recommendations might not be ready before an election, Ms. Guarnieri
replied: "It depends how quickly I can talk to everybody that wants to talk
to me, some people even want me to go back."
Mr.
Martin is expected to call an election in early April for mid-May, unless
negative public reaction to the federal sponsorship scandal continues to drag
the Liberal party down in public opinion polls. The government is expected to
make a decision on an election after the budget is tabled in late March.
If
an election is called before Ms. Guarnieri's review is complete, the Liberals
would avoid airing bitter division in their own ranks over the registry. Rural
MPs in Ontario and elsewhere are against the registry, while their colleagues in
urban ridings, especially in Toronto, the scene of several recent shootings,
support the law.
At
the same time, the Liberals appear to be be holding out hope to gun owners that
a re-elected Martin government might change the registry. At a speech to
wildlife association members in Ontario last week, Ms. Guarnieri assured gun
owners her eventual recommendations will address most of their concerns.
Mr.
Savoy's comments to the Telegraph-Journal this week also implied the Liberals
plan changes to appease gun owners, even if they are not announced until after
the election.
All
three leadership candidates for the Conservative party have pledged to scrap the
registry.
Saskatchewan
Conservative MP Garry Breitkreuz expressed surprise upon learning Ms. Guarnieri
might not complete her review before a vote.
"That's
unbelievable," said Mr. Breitkreuz. "This is a huge issue across the
country. I thought Paul Martin was committed to some of these reviews so that
people could decide on the issues."