PUBLICATION: The Toronto Sun
DATE:
2004.03.11
EDITION:
Final
SECTION:
Editorial/Opinion
PAGE:
14
COLUMN:
Editorial
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THROW
THE BOOK AT 'EM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like
it or not, the first step toward getting longer sentences for gang gunmen is
convincing our judges that it's in the public interest to do so. So we support
Ontario Attorney-General Michael Bryant's plan to persuade judges to throw the
book at them.
Bryant
said yesterday Crowns will put forward expert affidavits to focus the courts'
attention on the extent of gun crime in Toronto.
Sure,
it's long overdue. But the fellow we trust the most on this is Toronto's chief
Crown attorney, Paul Culver, who also supports this plan.
We've
always considered Culver to be a (pardon the expression) straight shooter about
the justice system and he says it's not enough just to call for mandatory
10-year sentences for gun crime - which we support.
As
he recently told the Sun: "There's no point in me standing up and demanding
a sentence of 20 years for a first-time offender, because even if the judge did
grant it, it would be overturned on appeal." In recent years, sentences for
violent crime have been going down "whether we like it or not," Culver
points out.
Crowns also have to contend with recent Criminal
Code amendments by the feds directing judges to consider the offenders'
backgrounds, rehabilitation prospects and finding ways to keep them out of jail
whenever possible.
We
need a public uprising - similar to what happened with drunk driving and
domestic assault years ago - to make it clear that revolving-door justice for
gun-toting criminals has to stop.
As
New Democrat MPP Marilyn Churley rightly put it - yes, you read that right, an
NDPer - "we want to make sure it's tough and we want to make sure it
happens right away." It won't, because moving our courts is like moving
mountains. But we have to make a start.
Tory
MPP Garfield Dunlop is right that the Liberals may be trying to divert attention
from their "soft stance on crime" and we're suspicious of their
other plan to make the storage rules even tougher for legal gun owners.
But we agree with any concerted effort to convince our judges to start throwing the book at those who use guns to commit crimes