PUBLICATION:
Calgary Herald
DATE:
2004.03.24
EDITION: Final
SECTION:
Comment
PAGE:
A23
BYLINE:
David Alford
SOURCE:
For the Calgary Herald
ILLUSTRATION:
Cartoon: For the Calgary Herald / (See hard copy for illustration).;
Photo: David Alford
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air
farce: Gun registry could take the wind out of recreational target pistols
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forget
about a free vote in Parliament on the future of Canada's gun registry. Forget
about a review of the program by the minister responsible. And the $1
billion-plus spent on the gun registry so far? Fuhgedaboudit!
For
months now, the Canadian Firearms Centre and the RCMP have been quietly working
to expand the scope of the registry to include high-end air pistols. So quietly,
in fact, that most Canadians affected by the change are unaware they are
breaking the law.
Mark
Briggs, a target shooter from Ottawa, says information has been
"intentionally withheld from Canada's airgun owners, so there is no way
they can reasonably know if they're in compliance with the law. . . .
Essentially, it's a black hole." Why
this silence? Because this is a textbook example of political bungling and
bureaucratic feather-nesting.
The
type of air pistol that the CFC and RCMP want to see added to the registry as a
restricted firearm is used by Canada's National Pistol Team, competitors from
other countries who are on the International Circuit, and Olympic athletes.
Typically, single-shot models cost between $1,500 and $2,000. With names like
Steyr, Morini, Feinwerkbau and Pardini, they're so funky-looking one of them
appeared in a Star Wars movie.
Yet,
despite posing no threat to public safety, law enforcement agencies wish to see
them heavily regulated. By reclassifying air pistols into restricted firearms,
what was once purchased legitimately -- and remember, this is after Canada
Customs permitted them to enter the country as non-firearms -- now requires all
the legal tapestry associated with owning a Colt .45 or .357 Magnum.
Ironically,
many air pistol enthusiasts, notably minors, purchased air guns precisely to
avoid the labyrinthine paperwork associated with owning real firearms. Wayne
Salhany, another Ottawa-based target shooter who has worked extensively with the
Shooting Federation of Canada on this issue, said the RCMP began reclassifying
airguns in July 2003. He considers the change a violation of fundamental
justice.
"Our
government is engaged in a high-handed and unilateral reclassification of
airguns legally imported, purchased and owned by Canadians without . . .
informing the current owners. These airguns are still sold and purchased today
without registration, even though the RCMP has reclassified them as restricted
firearms. Nobody is informing the dealers or purchasers of the (legal) change
and nobody is fixing these theoretically criminal transactions."
Salhany
and other top-flight target shooters fear they may not be able to bring their
air pistols back into Canada after representing their country at international
matches. Salhany says nobody outside the RCMP has seen a complete list of
re-classified air pistols. And the list keeps changing. All models of air
pistols manufactured in any country in the world must be considered one-by-one
to determine their legality -- a monumental work in progress. Long before
completion, the persons who started this process will be pensioned off.
Finally,
here's the real rub for affected Canadians. Canada has an antiquated standard
that says such pistols cannot exceed 500 feet per second (152.4 mps) muzzle
velocity, and 4.2 foot-pounds (5.7 joules) of muzzle energy. But most newer air
pistols surpass that standard.
According
to Ed Martin, vice-president of the Shooting Federation of Canada, Ottawa's
standing committee on justice and legal affairs has been aware of this looming
problem for a decade. Yet, these MPs have ignored expert recommendations to
adopt up-to-date standards. In effect, the RCMP, by the stroke of a pen, can
create a new class of criminal: the elite Canadian target shooter.
A clearer case of misdirected justice is hard to imagine.
Fortunately,
there is a solution.
First,
the laws must be changed to adopt a new standard. The European standard, known
as CIP, is compatible with competition airguns manufactured in western Europe.
They bear a clearly visible manufacturers' stamp, the letter F surrounded by a
pentagon, to indicate they were constructed not to not exceed the CIP standard
of 7.5 joules of muzzle energy.
The
British standard, known as the 6-12 rule, has an even higher energy limit, six
foot-pounds for air pistols and 12 foot-pounds for air rifles. Any airgun
meeting the European CIP also meets the British standard. Britain has tougher
gun laws than Canada, but a higher threshold before an airgun falls under them.
If
either the British or European standard were adopted, it would eliminate doubt
about the status of an airgun. Nothing could simplify the work of customs and
law enforcement agencies more.
In
the short term, federal Justice Minister Irwin Cotler should pass an order in
council to exempt high-end competition air pistols from reclassification as
restricted firearms. There's even a precedent for doing so: Criminal Code
regulations exempt international sporting competition handguns, so-called
Section 12/6 guns, from prohibited status.
If
that approach has worked for competition handguns, then why not for competition
airguns, too?
David Alford is a retired senior research officer with the federal Department of Justice. He shoots out of Calgary.