PUBLICATION: National Post
DATE:
2004.05.29
EDITION:
National
SECTION:
Editorials
PAGE:
A23
BYLINE:
Garry Breitkreuz
SOURCE:
National Post
NOTE:
Garry Breitkreuz is MP for Yorkton-Melville, Sask.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The
Liberals just don't get it
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On
Sept. 22, 1998, then justice minister Anne McLellan refused to address thousands
of responsible firearm owners rallying on Parliament Hill. Instead, she told the
media: "The debate is settled. The debate is over."
Almost
six years later, Ms. McLellan-- now the Deputy Prime Minister -- is still
tinkering with the Liberals' failed firearms legislation. But last week, she
failed to do what 76% of Canadians want the government to do: scrap the gun
registry.
Instead,
the Liberals have again allowed their disdain for legally owned guns and
law-abiding gun owners to trump their ability to do the right or politically
smart thing -- even with 10 years of deceit on the firearms file finally having
caught up with them.
The
facts on the gun registry are straightforward. Its cumulative cost is
$2-billion, just as the CBC reported in February, 2004. And it still costs
taxpayers more than $100-million per year. Over the past two years, the Official
Opposition has asked Liberal ministers 24 times to tell Parliament how much it
is going to cost to fully implement the gun registry; the Liberals have failed
to answer all 24.
And
despite its exorbitant price, the registry is riddled with errors and has
totally and utterly failed to reduce violent crime, homicides or suicides.
If
the government really wanted to control the costs of the gun registry, it would
make the entire $100-million wasted annually on it subject to a free vote, as
Liberal MP Roger Gallaway had demanded. If the Liberals can't figure out what
the public's law enforcement priorities are, then Parliament should be given the
chance to do it for them.
The
trouble with the Liberals' so-called gun-control laws is that they're aimed at
the wrong target. Amazingly, the 131,000 convicted criminals who have been
prohibited from owning firearms by the courts were excluded from the Firearms
Act. Consequently, they are protected by the Privacy Act, and don't have to
report changes of address to police or open their homes up for
"inspections," as law-abiding gun owners are required to do. The
Liberals have also conveniently failed to tell Canadians that even before they
rammed the Firearms Act through Parliament in 1995, the RCMP ran a Firearm
Acquisition Certificate program that was far more effective than the their
licencing scheme has ever been.
Since
the Liberals obviously just don't get it, it's time for voters to send them a
clear message that they can digest while sitting on the opposition benches for
the next four years.
----------------------------------------
FOR
MORE INFORMATON:
www.reelectgarrybreitkreuz.com