PUBLICATION:
The
Ottawa Citizen
DATE:
2004.10.29
EDITION:
Final
SECTION:
News
PNAME:
Editorial
PAGE:
A16
SOURCE:
The Ottawa Citizen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canada's
own moral majority
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With
abortion generally available on demand in Canada since the Supreme Court
declared abortion laws unconstitutional, it is surprising that so little
attention has been paid to a new survey that shows a majority of Canadians want
more legal controls on the procedure.
No
doubt, some will dismiss the survey because it was commissioned by LifeCanada,
an anti-abortion group. But as it was conducted by a reputable polling company,
Environics Research Group, the results suggest policy-makers are out of touch
with most Canadians. Indeed, the survey results contradict those who assume most
Canadians support a woman's unfettered right to abortion on demand.
The
poll shows 33 per cent of Canadians think the law should protect "human
life" from the point of conception, while 24 per cent think such protection
should be available after three months of pregnancy. In other words, 57 per cent
of Canadians don't agree with abortions beyond the first trimester of pregnancy.
More surprising, perhaps, is that more women than men -- 60 per cent to 53 per
cent -- feel this way.
Equally
startling, 73 per cent of Canadians support including "informed
consent" provisions in abortion laws, requiring doctors to advise women on
fetal development, abortion complications and alternatives before performing an
abortion. As well, 55 per cent believe girls under the age of 18 should get
parental consent to have an abortion. Finally, 72 per cent think tax dollars
should not be used to fund abortions or should only be used in medical
emergencies or in cases of rape and incest.
It's unlikely this poll
will have much effect on abortion rules in Canada, but it's still a useful
reminder that those who believe this issue was settled once and for all by the
Supreme Court are probably mistaken.