PUBLICATION:
The
Winnipeg Sun
DATE:
2004.11.05
EDITION:
Final
SECTION:
News
PAGE:
5
BYLINE:
TOM BRODBECK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JUSTICE
NOT BEING DONE CONVICTS BELONG IN JAIL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In
case you missed it, there were more convicts "serving time" at home in
Canada than there were behind bars in 2002-03, according to Statistics Canada.
It's the second year in a row that we've seen this phenomenon, The Sun reported
last week.
It's
part of the evolution of the Canadian justice system. We don't want convicts --
even serious, violent offenders -- doing time behind bars because it hurts their
chances of rehabilitation and it costs too much. So we tell them to go home and
do their time in their living rooms.
On
an average day in 2002-03, there were 10,600 adults serving time behind bars,
well below the 12,900 serving conditional sentences. In Manitoba, there were 620
adult convicts serving time in jail on an average day and a whopping 899 doing
hard time at home.
RARELY
CHECKED
Conditional
sentences, first introduced by the federal Liberals in 1996, have grown
immensely in popularity over the years. Judges are handing them out like bus
schedules at the Rockwood Institution. Some judges even have the gall to argue
that doing time at home is really "incarceration."
But
according to an internal Manitoba Justice memo that's crossed my desk, the
growing number of convicts on conditional sentences -- and others released from
the courts on so-called strict conditions, including bail -- are rarely checked.
"I believe that we could be looking into a major problem affecting
the safety of our citizens throughout Manitoba," the memo, penned in
January, reads.
It's
one thing for judges and magistrates to impose curfews and other restrictions,
such as abstaining from alcohol. But if nobody is checking these people, the
conditions aren't worth the paper they're written on.
"These
are convicted criminals being released on strict bail conditions, strict house
arrest (and) strict parole conditions," the memo says. "No one is
checking these people and the ones responsible for their release are not
ensuring they are being checked."
It's
pretty ominous. Of course the government would never admit this. The official
line from Manitoba Justice is always that convicts are being checked and there's
a program in place to deal with it. But when you talk to cops and people within
the justice system, including the author of this memo, they tell you a much
different story. You've got 900 or so convicts doing time at home on an average
day in Manitoba who, prior to 1996, would likely have been in jail.
IT'S
A JOKE
Now
they're out on the street and few, if any, of them are being supervised. It's a
joke. Judges love to sermonize when
handing out conditional sentences how these convicts will be under strict
conditions and that the public should not fear for its safety.
What
they don't talk about is who's going to ensure they follow their curfews and
other conditions. They don't talk about it because they don't have the foggiest
idea. "The media are becoming more and more aware of these releases and
will be asking questions should someone be seriously injured or killed due to
one of these strict releases," the memo says. I guess they'll wait until
someone is killed before they do anything about.