PUBLICATION:
The
Edmonton Sun
DATE: 2003.03.22
EDITION:
Final
SECTION:
Editorial/Opinion
PAGE:
11
BYLINE:
DOUG BEAZLEY, EDMONTON SUN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHRETIEN
HAMMERS NAIL IN COFFIN OF DEMOCRACY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ironies
abound in life. How fitting that in the same week he backed away from joining a
campaign to bring democracy to the Middle East at bayonet-point, Jean Chretien
was doing his best to drive democracy out of Canada for good.
This
week saw what might have been the final and ultimate act of political malice by
our morally bankrupt prime minister. By threatening his MPs with expulsion from
caucus if they vote no on Tuesday's $59-million appropriation for the gun
registry, Chretien has signalled his sickening contempt for the principles of
parliamentary democracy.
It
is his final manipulation of our traditions, the last slap in the face before
this pea-brained plutocrat moves to the cottage for good - and good riddance.
"It
kind of makes you feel like a whore," said Liberal MP Roger Gallaway on
Thursday. He leads the pack of Grit backbenchers who've publicly criticized the
registry, and who were threatened by the PM with losing their right to run as
Liberals if they oppose new funding for the program on Tuesday.
"Basically,
the message from (the PMO) is, 'Don't try to do your job. If you try to
represent your constituents' wishes, you will be fired.
"What
we have now is government by Crown prerogative. You do what the King tells you
to do or it's off with your head.
"Frankly,
I'm frightened for the state of democracy in this country."
It's
a good time to be frightened. Let's recap: the federal Liberals introduced a gun
registry. This gun registry turned out to be a bottomless black hole for public
funding - originally slated to cost around $2 million, it's expected to hit the
$1-billion mark by 2005.
Thanks
to a combination of ideological blindness, wishful thinking and very bad
planning, the cost of the registry was as wildly underestimated as its benefits
were exaggerated. The government lied to and misled its own and opposition MPs
repeatedly about the registry's true costs. When pressed to explain themselves,
cabinet ministers still repeat a threadbare mantra about "Canadian
values" and "public safety" with all the sincerity of
brainwashing victims.
The
registry has been a policy failure on every level: costly, ineffective, wildly
inaccurate. Most cops repudiate it. The public supports it only in theory -
because government polling asks them to express their opinions about "gun
control," not the registry itself. The registry doesn't provide gun control
because it can't be trusted. But the Chretien cabinet can't let go of it because
they can't admit to having made a $1-billion mistake.
Not
yet, at any rate. Because the prime minister is marking time to retirement, he's
understandably reluctant to let the registry's flameout end up on his
end-of-term report card. The registry has to die because it won't stop bleeding
money. But Chretien, peevish and egotistical old crank that he is, would rather
defer its death until after his hated enemy Paul Martin takes office. To stick
it to Martin, Chretien will waste another $59 million in public money and
complete the Commons' transformation into farce.
Chretien
and his creatures insist the registry vote is a "confidence" vote, one
that would force a snap election if it's lost. This is another lie. MPs turned
down cabinet's request for $72 million for the registry back in December - a
vote cabinet initially characterized as a confidence vote before it became clear
it was going to lose.
Technically,
if Tuesday's vote is a confidence vote, so was the one in December. But there
was no election call then, and no justification for one now.
Our
government institutions have been perverted into a vehicle for the whims of a
dimwitted ward-heeler. And don't look to Paul Martin to fix this situation: he's
a creature of the party, and a party to its worst excesses. He will only restore
the power and dignity of the Commons if he is forced.
The
only thing that can force him is a massive split in the Grit caucus during next
week's vote. A lot of Liberals are going to have to put their jobs on the line
in order to make the Commons work again. Does anyone have the guts?