- FEB.
9, 2009 - NEWS RELEASE: BREITKREUZ
BILL TO SCRAP THE USELESS LONG-GUN REGISTRY . . . click
here
- APRIL
10, 2006 - BREITKREUZ RE-INTRODUCES BILL TO PROTECT PROPERTY
RIGHTS . . . click here
- October
26, 2005 - BREITKREUZ INTRODUCES BILL TO IMPLEMENT SECTION 12(6.1)
OF THE FIREARMS ACT . . . click
here
-
Bill
C-409 Firearms Sunset Act
House
Of Commons, Sept 27, 2000
This
enactment will provide a 5-year sunset provision on all gun
control legislation, other than the use of a firearm in an indictable
offence, unless the Auditor General has reported that it has
been a successful and cost-effective measure to increase public
safety and reduce violent crime involving the use of firearms.
The report has to be considered by a committee representing
broad interests, and a committee report must be presented to
the House of Commons and the Commons has to concur in the continuance.
Expiry may be deferred to allow Parliament to pass amendments
to allow gun control provisions to expire without affecting
parts of the Act that do not relate to gun control and that
are to continue.
Bill
C-409 was debated in the House of Commons on September 27, 2000.
For the full text of the debate click
here.
September
28, 2000 The
Report on the Firearms Act The Auditor General Would Have Given
If . . .
HOUSE
OF COMMONS
Tuesday, June 13, 2000
ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACT
Mr. Garry Breitkreuz (Yorkton-Melville, Canadian Alliance)
moved for leave to introduce Bill C-489, an act to amend the
Access to Information Act (cabinet confidences).
He
said: Mr. Speaker, in June 1999 the government used the provision
for total exclusion of cabinet confidences under section 69
of the Access to Information Act to keep 172 pages of gun registry
budget information a state secret. In September the government
used the cabinet confidences exclusion again to hide from the
public a 115 page report on the economic impact of
the gun registry. That was enough for me and I knew the law
had to be changed. The purpose of this bill is to make certain
amendments to the act as recommended by the information commissioner
in his 1996 report, The Access to Information Act and the Cabinet
Confidences: A Discussion of New Approaches. The information
commissioner was kind enough to recommend changes to an earlier
draft of this bill.
This bill makes cabinet confidences mandatory exemptions as
opposed to exclusions. This results in the withholding of information
and documents that are considered cabinet confidences being
subject to the independent review under the act, rather than
the entire act being inapplicable to them. The bill also excludes
from the exemption documents that refer to but do not reveal
the substance of cabinet confidences. Among other safeguards,
this bill would require that requests for cabinet confidences
be handled only by officers who have received the appropriate
security clearance.
(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)
C-489-- Mr. Breitkreuz (Yorkton -- Melville) -- An Act to amend
the Access to Information Act (Cabinet confidences) Introduced
and read the first time -- June 13, 2000
For
more information click on the link below.
http://www.parl.gc.ca/cgi-bin/36/bills_indiv.pl?eC-489:2
-
Bill
C-437: AN ACT FOR THE RECOGNITION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN
RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL
FREEDOMS
February 25, 2000
COMMONS
DEBATES
Mr.
Garry Breitkreuz (Yorkton-Melville, Ref.) moved for leave to
introduce Bill C-437, an act to amend an act for the recognition
and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms and
to amend the Constitution Act, 1867.
He said: Mr. Speaker, this is the fourth time I have introduced
my property rights bill in the House. The government has such
disdain for any
legislative protection for property rights that thus far it
has refused to make my previous attempts votable, and it has
refused all attempts to even have my proposals reviewed by the
standing committee. Individual property rights need strengthening
because they were intentionally left out of the charter of rights
and freedoms. Recent court cases have proven that
Canadians have no protection whatsoever from the arbitrary taking
of property by the federal government. My bill would make up
for this mind-boggling omission from the charter by strengthening
the property rights provisions in the Canadian bill of rights.
My bill would also require a
two-thirds majority vote of the House whenever the government
passes laws that override fundamental property rights, like
it did when it passed the Firearms Act and the Canadian Wheat
Board Act.
(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)
For
more information on C-437 click here
Bill
Summary: This enactment will provide the means for individual
taxpayers to inform the government on their views on levels
and priorities for the expenditure of tax revenues by completed
a Peoples Tax Form and sending it in with their tax
returns. The submission of the form is voluntary. The Minister
of National Revenue is then required to analyze the Forms
and consolidate the opinions in an analysis presented to Parliament.
The Standing Committee of the House of Commons on Finance
will then study the analysis and its relation to proposed
expenditures of public money and report to the House. The
Committee has the power to recommend changes to expenditures,
changes to the Form and changes to the Act. The Form may be
amended by order of the Governor in Council, provided the
House has first been advised.
Bill
introduced: Sep 29, 1997 (Click
here for News Release)
Placed
on the Order of Precedence -- September 30, 1997
Pursuant
to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by:
Mr.
Bailey (Souris -- Moose Mountain) and Mr. Breitkreuz (Yellowhead)
-- October 22, 1997
Mr.
Lowther (Calgary Centre) -- October 23, 1997
Mr.
Ritz (Battlefords -- Lloydminster) -- November 4, 1997
Bill
debated and defeated: Nov 27, 1997 (Click
here for News Release)
(Click
here for full text of Bill C-214)
(Click
here for sample Tax Form)
Bill
Summary: This enactment will provide a 5-year sunset provision
on all gun control legislation, other than the use of a firearm
in an indictable offence, unless the Auditor General has reported
that it has been a successful and cost-effective measure to
increase public safety and reduce violent crime involving
the use of firearms. The report has to be considered by a
committee representing broad interests, and the committee
report must be presented to and concurred in by the House
of Commons.
Bill
introduced: Nov 7, 1997 (Click
here for News Release)
Pursuant
to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by:
Mr.
Bailey (Souris -- Moose Mountain) and Mr. Pankiw (Saskatoon
-- Humboldt) -- November 18, 1997
Mr.
Mark (Dauphin -- Swan River) and Mr. Ritz (Battlefords --
Lloydminster) -- November 20, 1997
Placed
on the Order of Precedence -- December 7, 1998
Debated
at second reading; dropped from the Order Paper -- April 30,
1999
(Click
here for full text of Bill C-278)
Bill
Summary: The purpose of this enactment is to provide a
greater measure of protection in the Canadian Bill of Rights
for the property rights of both individuals and corporations.
The bill amends the Canadian Bill of Rights and adds two new
sections to the Constitution Act of 1867, thereby strengthening
property rights in federal law. If passed, the bill would
specifically guarantee that every person has (1) the right
to the enjoyment of their property, (2) the right not to be
deprived of their property unless they are given a fair hearing,
paid fair, timely and impartially-fixed compensation, and
(3) the right to appeal to the courts if their property rights
have been infringed upon or denied. Every persons property
rights would be guaranteed in every law in Canada unless it
is expressly declared that the Act shall operate notwithstanding
the Canadian Bill of Rights. An adoption of a declaration
of notwithstanding would require the votes of at least two-thirds
of the Members of the House of Commons.
Bill
introduced: Dec 11, 1997 (Click
here for News Release)
Pursuant
to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by:
Mr.
Stinson (Okanagan -- Shuswap) -- February 17, 1998
Placed
on the Order of Precedence -- June 5, 1998
Debated
at second reading; dropped from the Order Paper -- October 5,
1998
(Click
here for full text of Bill C-304)
|