Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Team CSSA E-News – August 14, 2015

COMMENTARY  THOMAS MULCAIR WANTS YOUR GUNS 

With the federal election now underway, NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair is making a big deal of how his party promises it will not re-institute a long-gun registry. The trouble is that every time Mr. Mulcair makes this statement, he is not telling the truth.

How can we accuse Thomas Mulcair of being less than honest with Canadians? Easily, because his own “policy backgrounder” says he would bring back the gun registry. From page three of the document “Thomas Mulcair Policy Backgrounder” (PDF) under the heading of “Putting an End to Violence Against Women,” Thomas Mulcair says he would:

“Renew the federal government’s commitment to gun control including developing a more effective, better managed system of firearms registration.”

 If Mulcair has no intention of bringing back the gun registry as he claimed recently in London, Ontario, and reported in the July 25th Edmonton Sun, then why does his own a policy document specifically say he would?

We have no intention of bringing back a gun registry,” Mulcair told reporters in London, Ontario. Now I do want to make sure our police have the tools necessary … but the NDP has no intention whatsoever of bringing back the gun registry.” (Edmonton Sun, July 25, 2015)

Given that this document carries Thomas Mulcair’s photograph and website (ThomasMulcair.ca), it appears Mulcair’s recent claims that the NDP would not bring back the long-gun registry are merely politically expedient falsehoods aimed directly at Canadian gun owners.

Just six months ago, Mulcair said unequivocally that he WOULD bring back the long-gun registry at the earliest opportunity.

“I think that it is possible to provide the police with the tools to better protect the public and themselves by making sure they’re able to follow every gun, and it doesn’t have to be the registry as it was before. But it does have to be a form that allows the governments, federal and provincial, to keep track of those guns. That’s our bottom line.”

Then to clear up any confusion about where he stood on the issue, Thomas Mulcair said:

“We will bring in something that allows the police to track every gun in Canada.”

Hmmm … that sure sounds like a gun registry, doesn’t it?

After his December 3, 2014 caucus meeting, Mulcair told reporters: 

“The NDP’s position on the gun registry is that we favour the registration of guns. [..] The NDP favours the registration of guns, especially this week which is the week that contains the anniversary of the terrible tragedy at Polytechnique. We will continue to say clearly that we favour the registration of guns, period…”

“What we’ve said is that the registration of guns is essential to help protect the public. We would bring back a form of registration. We would be certain to avoid some of the pitfalls of the last version.”

Uh huh. The cheque is in the mail … and other trite sayings come to mind.

The interesting thing about Mulcair’s gun registry comments is he never talked to his caucus colleagues about his plan to bring back the gun registry, sparking a public feud between Mulcair and NDP MP Charlie Angus.

“When I read that headline I literally banged my head on the desk,” Angus said.

Prior to that, the NDP voted unanimously to keep the gun registry and the two NDP MPs who dared vote for their constituents and against the NDP party line were sanctioned by the party.

But the NDP won’t bring back the gun registry? Really?

How about gun bans? From the NDP policy book: “Stopping the smuggling of illegal firearms and enable all municipalities, provinces, and territories to implement a ban on handguns.”

Sorry, did someone say “ban”?

Given the Quebec political zeal for over-the-top gun control, it appears Mr. Mulcair is focused entirely on maintaining his Quebec seats and couldn’t give a damn about the rest of Canada, especially the two million lawfully licensed firearm owners.

A socialist career politician doesn’t appear to be the best hope for Canadian firearm owners to keep their guns. In fact, the exact opposite is likely true. With an NDP government under Thomas Mulcair, it seems likely we will kiss many of our firearms goodbye.


“Allan Rock said he came to Ottawa with the belief that only the police and military should have firearms. I believe that firearms ownership is a right, but a right that comes with responsibilities.” – The Honourable Steven Blaney, Minister of Public Safety

HELP SUPPORT THE GREAT WORK THE CSSA DOES TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS.   DONATE HERE


WANTED: CSSA MEMBERS FOR CANADIAN ELECTION ADS VIDEO SERIES

Be a part of the federal election.  Help us ensure gun owners are heard this October!  

The CSSA is producing a series of videos for the federal election and we’re looking for gun owning men, women and families of all ages to be the faces and voices of Canadian Firearm Owners.  Each ad will be 30 seconds long and will touch on the many reasons why gun owners should vote in this federal election.

If you live in BC’s lower mainland and would like to volunteer an hour or two of your time please contact Christopher di Armani at electionvideos@diarmani.com with the following information:

*   Name
*   Phone Number
*   Email Address

We will contact you with all the details about how you can help us ensure gun owners are heard on October 19th!


THE NDP WANTS TO MAKE IT EASIER TO BAN GUNS (Brian Lilley | The Rebel | August 11, 2015)

What is the reality of the NDP on guns? I take a look at official NDP policy and am shocked to find out they actually want to bring in a gun ban on top of bringing in a gun registry.

Watch and learn then make sure you share this shocking information.

See the video: http://www.therebel.media/the_ndp_wants_to_make_it_easier_to_ban_guns?utm_campaign=ndp_on_guns&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel 


CSSA TRAINING COURSES – The CSSA is teaching Club Level Safety Instructor/Train the Trainer and Range Safety Officer Instructor courses at its headquarters: 116 Galaxy Boulevard, on the following dates:

 ·         August 22

·         August 23

Room is still available and the only requirement is that anyone attending be a CSSA member. Book your space now as class size is limited to 20 students! To RSVP, please phone Monday to Friday at (416) 679-9959.


ORDER IN COUNCIL – SWISS ARMS AND CZ’S – SOR/2015-213 JULY 31, 2015 (Canada Gazette | Vol. 149, No. 16 – August 12, 2015)

CRIMINAL CODE

Regulations Amending the Regulations Prescribing Certain Firearms and Other Weapons, Components and Parts of Weapons, Accessories, Cartridge Magazines, Ammunition and Projectiles as Prohibited or Restricted

P.C. 2015-1177 July 31, 2015

His Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Justice, pursuant to the definitions “non-restricted firearm” (see footnote a) and “restricted firearm” (see footnote b) in subsection 84(1) of the Criminal Code (see footnote c) and to subsection 117.15(1) (see footnote d) of that Act, makes the annexed Regulations Amending the Regulations Prescribing Certain Firearms and other Weapons, Components and Parts of Weapons, Accessories, Cartridge Magazines, Ammunition and Projectiles as Prohibited or Restricted.

REGULATIONS AMENDING THE REGULATIONS PRESCRIBING CERTAIN FIREARMS AND OTHER WEAPONS, COMPONENTS AND PARTS OF WEAPONS, ACCESSORIES, CARTRIDGE MAGAZINES, AMMUNITION AND PROJECTILES AS PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED

AMENDMENTS

1. The title of the Regulations Prescribing Certain Firearms and Other Weapons, Components and Parts of Weapons, Accessories, Cartridge Magazines, Ammunition and Projectiles as Prohibited or Restricted (see footnote 1) is replaced by the following:

REGULATIONS PRESCRIBING CERTAIN FIREARMS AND OTHER WEAPONS, COMPONENTS AND PARTS OF WEAPONS, ACCESSORIES, CARTRIDGE MAGAZINES, AMMUNITION AND PROJECTILES AS PROHIBITED, RESTRICTED OR NON-RESTRICTED

2. Section 3 of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

3. The firearms listed in Part 2 of the schedule are restricted firearms for the purposes of paragraph (d) of the definition “restricted firearm” in subsection 84(1) of the Criminal Code, except for those firearms that are prohibited firearms within the meaning of paragraph (b) or (c) of the definition “prohibited firearm” in that subsection.

3.1 The firearms listed in Part 2.1 of the schedule that have a barrel that is less than 470 mm in length, and firearms listed in items 3, 4, 6, 7, 9 and 10 of that Part that do not have a barrel, are restricted firearms for the purposes of paragraph (d) of the definition “restricted firearm” in subsection 84(1) of the Criminal Code, except for those firearms that

(a) discharge projectiles in rapid succession during one pressure of the trigger; or

(b) are prohibited firearms within the meaning of paragraph (b) of the definition “prohibited firearm” in subsection 84(1) of the Criminal Code.

3.2 The firearms listed in Part 2.1 of the schedule that have a barrel that is at least 470 mm in length, and the firearms listed in items 1, 2, 5, 8 and 11 to 15 of that Part that do not have a barrel, are non-restricted firearms for the purposes of paragraph (b) of the definition “non-restricted firearm” in subsection 84(1) of the Criminal Code, except for those firearms that

(a) discharge projectiles in rapid succession during one pressure of the trigger; or

(b) are prohibited firearms within the meaning of paragraph (b) of the definition “prohibited firearm” in subsection 84(1) of the Criminal Code.

3. The schedule to the Regulations is amended by adding the following after Part 2:

PART 2.1

FIREARMS FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTIONS 3.1 AND 3.2

Ceská Zbrojovka (CZ) Model CZ858 Tactical-2P rifle

Ceská Zbrojovka (CZ) Model CZ858 Tactical-2V rifle

Ceská Zbrojovka (CZ) Model CZ858 Tactical-4P rifle

Ceská Zbrojovka (CZ) Model CZ858 Tactical-4V rifle

SAN Swiss Arms Model Classic Green rifle

SAN Swiss Arms Model Classic Green carbine

SAN Swiss Arms Model Classic Green CQB rifle

SAN Swiss Arms Model Black Special rifle

SAN Swiss Arms Model Black Special carbine

SAN Swiss Arms Model Black Special CQB rifle

SAN Swiss Arms Model Black Special Target rifle

SAN Swiss Arms Model Blue Star rifle

SAN Swiss Arms Model Heavy Metal rifle

SAN Swiss Arms Model Red Devil rifle

SAN Swiss Arms Model Swiss Arms Edition rifle

COMING INTO FORCE

4. These Regulations come into force on the day on which they are registered.

REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT

(This statement is not part of the Regulations.)

Issues

The Regulations amend the Regulations Prescribing Certain Firearms and other Weapons, Components and Parts of Weapons, Accessories, Cartridge Magazines, Ammunition and Projectiles as Prohibited or Restricted to prescribe the CZ858 and Swiss Arms rifles as either restricted or non-restricted, as the case may be. This results in their status being the same as it was prior to the 2014 classification redeterminations. While the Amnesty Order 2014 provides a temporary solution that insulates firearms owners from possible prosecution and restores certain privileges, the Regulations provide certainty and finality with respect to the legal status of these firearms.

Background

In Canada, there are three different classes of firearms: firearms are either non-restricted, restricted or prohibited. Each of these terms are defined at subsection 84(1) of the Criminal Code and the definitions include firearms that are prescribed by regulation to be prohibited, restricted or non-restricted.

Non-restricted firearms include most common long-guns such as hunting rifles and shotguns. Restricted firearms include most handguns and semi-automatic centre-fire firearms with a barrel length of less than 470 mm. Semi-automatic firearms are capable of discharging one projectile each time the trigger is pulled and reload automatically. Prohibited firearms include fully automatic firearms (e.g. machine guns), firearms that are adapted from a rifle or shotgun to be less than 660 mm in length (e.g. sawed-off firearms) and handguns with a barrel length equal to or less than 105 mm, or are designed or adapted to discharge a .25 or .32 calibre cartridge.

The classification of firearms determines which measures must be taken to lawfully possess, store and transport them in accordance with the Firearms Act.

The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (the Minister of Public Safety) is the lead minister responsible for firearms policy in Canada, while the Minister of Justice is responsible for the criteria defining the classification of firearms and firearms-related offences in the Criminal Code. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) Canadian Firearms Program is responsible for the administration of the Firearms Act, which includes, among other things, making technical determinations of the classification of firearms in accordance with the Criminal Code. Usually, the determination of a firearm classification, based on theCriminal Code, takes place either at the time of manufacture in, or the importation into, Canada.

Bill C-42, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make a related amendment and a consequential amendment to other Acts(the Common Sense Firearms Licensing Act), received royal assent on June 18, 2015. Amongst other things, that Act amended theCriminal Code to provide new legal authority to address firearms classification issues. The Act created a definition of “non-restricted firearm” and it also amended the Governor in Council’s authority to make regulations prescribing firearms to be either “restricted firearm” or “non-restricted firearm,” as the case may be, notwithstanding the fact that the prescribed firearms meet the legal definition of “prohibited firearm” or “restricted firearm” in the Criminal Code. These provisions came into force on June 18, 2015.

Occasionally, it comes to the attention of the RCMP Canadian Firearms Program that a firearm has been incorrectly classified. Upon further inspection, the determination of the firearm classification may be updated pursuant to the law and regulations currently in force. These changes can have serious consequences and impacts on law abiding firearms owners, businesses and law enforcement. For firearms owners who purchased these firearms in good faith, such changes may result in a situation where they have to dispose of their firearms and suffer financial losses or otherwise face serious criminal sanctions. For businesses, a change in the determination of the classification of a firearm can have an adverse impact on their ability to import and sell merchandise. For law enforcement, these changes in the determination of the classification of a firearm impact the investigation of criminal offences involving firearms. It is, therefore, important that the classification of firearms as either prohibited, restricted or non-restricted be clear. 

Ceská Zbrojovka (CZ) Model CZ858 Tactical-2 and Tactical-4 rifles

In 2005, the RCMP identified the Ceská Zbrojovka Model CZ858 Tactical-2 and Tactical-4 rifles (the CZ858) as non-restricted or restricted depending on barrel length based on information received by the manufacturer. This information was subsequently confirmed by a physical inspection of the samples at the time. The Firearms Reference Table (an administrative document used by the Canadian Firearms Program and other public agencies to assist in the application of the Criminal Code definitions of firearms) was updated and these firearms were permitted to be imported, registered and sold in Canada. 

In March 2013, the RCMP inspected and provided an expert opinion on the classification of a series of CZ858 rifles proof marked 2007 or later. Following an internal review, the RCMP determined that at some point between 2006 and 2007, the CZ858 rifles being imported into Canada differed from the inspected version and were in fact manufactured as fully automatic firearms that had been converted to semi-automatic firearms, rather than being semi-automatic as reported by the manufacturer. This meant these firearms met the legal definition of “prohibited firearm.” Fully automatic firearms are prohibited under the Criminal Code because they pose significant public safety concerns given their fast reloading action and their ability to discharge multiple projectiles with a single pull of the trigger, and have no legitimate use such as for hunting or target practice. 

On February 26, 2014, the RCMP determined that some CZ858 rifles were prohibited firearms according to the Criminal Code. The RCMP concluded that prior importation and registration of some CZ858 rifles occurred as a result of inaccurate information provided by importers and manufacturers.

The Canada Border Services Agency estimates more than 8 700 CZ858 rifles have been imported into Canada. The estimated value of these firearms is between $500 and $1,000 each.

Swiss Arms Classic Green rifles and its variants

In 2001, after a Canadian importer requested a classification opinion of the Swiss Arms Classic Green rifles and its variants (the Swiss Arms) in order to authorize importation and registration in Canada, the RCMP reviewed documentation provided by the importer which portrayed the Swiss Arms rifles as a semi-automatic variant of the Swiss Arms SG-540. Based upon these documents, the RCMP created a Firearms Reference Table entry naming this model of firearm as non-restricted or restricted, depending on the barrel length. These firearms were henceforth permitted to be imported, registered and sold in Canada.

Following a complaint in December 2012, which alleged that prohibited variants of Swiss Arms rifles (the SG-550 rifles) were being imported into Canada under the guise of being non-restricted and restricted SG-540 rifle variants, the RCMP inspected three of these firearms and sought additional information from manufacturers that had represented these firearms as non-restricted or restricted, depending on barrel length.

On February 26, 2014, the RCMP determined that all the Classic Green Rifles and its variants previously imported and sold in Canada as non-restricted or restricted firearms, were in fact prohibited firearms as a variant of the SG-550 rifle (prescribed as prohibited at section 83 of the Regulations Prescribing Certain Firearms and other Weapons, Components and Parts of Weapons, Accessories, Cartridge Magazines, Ammunition and Projectiles as Prohibited or Restricted, as well as under the definitions in theCriminal Code). The RCMP concluded that prior importation and registration occurred as a result of inaccurate information provided by importers and manufacturers. 

It is estimated that there are more than 2 000 Swiss Arms rifles in Canada. The estimated value of these firearms is between $3,000 and $4,000 each. 

See the full text of SOR/2015-213: http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2015/2015-08-12/html/sor-dors213-eng.php 


OSHAWA CONSERVATIVE TARGET SHOOT FUNDRAISER – AUGUST 15, 2015 – ORONO FISH AND HUNT CLUB – ORONO, ONTARIO. Located at 3292 – 7th Concession between Brown Road and Leskard Road. 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. $65 per person. Barbecue lunch will be served. This is an annual favourite, providing supporters the opportunity to safely handle and discharge a wide assortment of firearms with the assistance of trained and seasoned firearms owners. Special guest: MP Colin Carrie. To purchase tickets, please visit: http://www.oshawaconservatives.ca or call 905-721-9022. 

See the invitation: http://oshawaconservatives.ca/products/target-shoot-fundraiser 


CANADA IN THE ROUGH – THREE TOMS DOWN

In this week’s episode, Keith Beasley takes his dad out into the turkey woods of Ontario, Canada, in the hopes of getting his dad his first ever Tom! In this same episode, Paul Beasley goes out and has an aggressive Tom come in and destroy his decoy!

See the teaser: http://www.canadaintherough.com/three-toms-down/

Canada in the Rough can be found on OLN, WILD TV, and CHEX. For a full schedule, visit: http://www.canadaintherough.com/schedules/ 


SAVAGE ARMS GUNS AT CANADIAN TIRE ‘SHOCKED’ CLAYTON PARK SHOPPERS — U.S. COMPANY SAYS GUNS NAMED FOR FOUNDER ARTHUR SAVAGE; LOGO WAS A GIFT FROM A CHIEF LAME DEER (By Anjuli Patil | CBC News | August 11, 2015)

A Nova Scotia woman wants Canadian Tire to get rid of a brand of firearms she says are offensive to Aboriginal Peoples.

Myah Rach-Sharp was at the Clayton Park Canadian Tire store last week when she saw Savage Arms guns for sale.

“When I looked closer I saw that there was a picture on top with an Aboriginal man in a headdress,” she said. “It just shocked me that in today’s day and age that that would be acceptable.”

Savage Arms is a company based in the U.S. The founder’s name was Arthur Savage.

On the history section of its website, it says the logo was given to the founder by a Chief Lame Deer in 1919. The website says the two made a deal that the tribe would receive discounted rifles and Savage would get their support.

“Arthur Savage added the Indian-head logo — a direct gift from the chief — to the company name,” it says.

It doesn’t give the chief’s tribal affiliation, or any other biographical information. 

Rach-Sharp said the backstory doesn’t make a difference.  

“It’s racist in the way that it puts the two together,” she said. “I think they should discontinue selling those guns.”

She isn’t the only person who finds the logo offensive.

Glen Reykdal thinks the company should change the logo.

“The image that was portrayed, the Indian chief with the headdress on that went along with it, yeah, I would find that offensive,” he said.

A spokesperson for Canadian Tire referred CBC News to the Savage Arms website.

See the story: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/savage-arms-guns-at-canadian-tire-shocked-clayton-park-shoppers-1.3186654 


LOOKING FOR UPCOMING GUN SHOWS AND MATCHES? Visit our website at:

https://cssa-cila.org/upcoming-events-matches/


FIREARM SALES RISE WITH OUTBREAK OF FOXES, FERAL PIGS, GOATS AND DEER (By John Thistleton | The Canberra Times | August 7, 2015)

A population explosion of foxes, feral pigs and three deer species is driving demand for high-calibre rifles, according to Braidwood Outdoors, which says 50 per cent of its firearm and bow sales is coming from Canberra.

A Braidwood district farmer told proprietor Steve West he had strung up 72 shot foxes along the branches of a dead tree on his property.

Red, sambar and fallow deer are in the sights of rifle and bow hunters, Mr West said. The red and fallow deer had escaped years ago from farms in the region and were breeding up in numbers.

“They will wreck a fence, and they taste pretty good,” he said. “A lot are taking feed from cattle, and with cattle prices pretty good, the deer are a real pest.”

The .223-calibre rifles were a popular choice among hunters. “They have more oomph than a .22 and you need that to shoot something at 300 metres, the smaller .22 won’t do it. For pigs and goats, a .308 will finish the job in one shot. All professional roo shooters use .223, a smaller calibre because if they miss, which they rarely do, the bullet won’t continue to travel too far.”

The NSW Greens issued data showing gun ownership has increased 25 per cent in towns around Canberra. In the Bywong and Bungendore districts it had jumped 27.4 per cent, while the number of licensed firearms in the greater Goulburn area increased 23.3 per cent.

Mr West said he was not surprised more people wanted guns. “The truth is, in the last 12 months three times the number of people have applied for a firearms licence than in the past five years at the Firearms Registry in Murwillumbah.

“This [his shop] is where legal blokes come to buy a rifle. If they clamp down on them, criminals will be the ony ones with them. If you want to buy an illegal gun you go to Kings Cross and buy it out of the boot of a car,” he said.

Mr West said the United States dentist who shot Cecil the lion would not be welcome in his shop. “He’s an idiot, a complete fool, someone out to shoot a pet lion, what a nutcase.”

Dean Hamilton, who works at the outdoor shop, says people need to look further into the case and consider the role of the professional Zimbabwean hunting guides who put Mr Palmer in that position.

Mr Hamilton said guides elsewhere managed game hunting more responsibly and returned profits into sustaining animal populations.

In the Canberra region, bow hunting sites say state forests at Captains Flat have plenty of feral animals. One hunter said at a property owner’s request, 1300 goats had been culled over two years.

See the story: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/firearm-sales-rise-with-outbreak-of-foxes-feral-pigs-goats-and-deer-20150805-gisat3.html#ixzz3idvZNQO5 


REMINGTON GREAT AMERICANS SHOOT 2015 – SEPTEMBER 26, 2015 – ROSHARON, TEXAS

Last year at the inaugural RGAS, $1.2 million was raised by 100 people! It was the largest sporting clay fundraiser ever, and we aim to raise even more money this year. Every dollar raised goes to helping military non-profit charities. Half of the proceeds go to the Special Forces Charitable Trust (SFCT), which provides meaningful and sustainable support to Green Berets and their families. The other half goes to selected other military non-profits.

Click here to learn more about the 2015 Shoot!


GUN OWNERS SA WANTS TO MANAGE FIREARMS REGISTRY IN THE FACE OF COP KILLINGS (Primedia Broadcasting | August 7, 2015)

Nearly sixty officers have been killed since the start of the year.

This has led to questions about how the firearms in the country are managed and whether in fact gun-ownership by civilians should be banned.

Gun Owners South Africa (Gosa) has expressed its interest in helping the police and government rid the streets of unlicensed firearms.

The organisation wants to streamline the process of dealing with lawful firearm owners by reducing the burden on the authorities to manage the firearms registry.

Stephen Grootes spoke with Adele Kirsten, Spokesperson for Gun Free SA, who says that evidence shows that strengthening gun laws and limiting possession has a positive impact on reducing gun violence.

Handguns are the preferred mechanisms of choice for criminals. They are concealable and fairly durable. In close to 85% of armed robberies, a firearm is used and recent research shows that there is an intimate link between criminal attitudes and both legal and illegal firearms.

— Adele Kirsten, Spokesperson for Gun Free SA

On the other hand, Spokesperson for Gosa John Welch, says that tighter regulation on guns will not have any impact on crime.

We don’t believe it will reduce crime. It will only create easy targets and victims. The police service is incapable of enforcing laws and protecting the public. Their average response time is unacceptable. We can’t disarm ordinary civilians. It will be a sad day for the country if we ban firearms.

— John Welch, Spokesperson for Gosa

See the story: http://www.702.co.za/articles/4400/gun-owners-sa-wants-to-manage-firearms-registry


THANKS FOR YOUR SUPPORT!

The CSSA is the voice of the sport shooter and firearms enthusiast in Canada. Our national membership supports and promotes Canada’s firearms heritage, traditional target shooting competitions, modern action shooting sports, hunting, and archery. We support and sponsor youth programs and competitions that promote these Canadian heritage activities.

To join or donate to the CSSA, visit: http://www.cssa-cila.org 


Subscribe /Unsubscribe to the CSSA-CILA E-NEWS on our website.

SUBSCRIBE | UNSUBSCRIBE BY EMAIL:

To subscribe send an email to: mailto:cssa-cila-e-news-subscribe@mail.cssa-cila.org

To unsubscribe send an email to: mailto:cssa-cila-e-news-unsubscribe@mail.cssa-cila.org


CANADIAN SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION | CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION

116 Galaxy Boulevard, Etobicoke ON  M9W 4Y6

Phone: 416-679-9959 | Fax: 416-679-9910

Toll Free: 1-888-873-4339

E-Mail: info@cssa-cila.org

Website: CSSA The Canadian Shooting Sports Assoc.

Continue Your Journey with CSSA

Renew your membership and sustain your passion for shooting sports.

To Preserve, Promote and Protect the Lawful Use and Ownership of Firearms in Canada

Contact CSSA

1143 Wentworth St W #204, Oshawa, ON L1J 8P7
Toll-Free: 1-888-873-4339
Phone: 905-720-3142
Email: info@cssa-cila.org

Newsletter

[mc4wp_form id="461" element_id="style-9"]

© 1998–2024. Canadian Shooting Sports Association | All Rights Reserved

Website by mango media